Breitbart Gang teams up with Real Porn WikiLeaks Crew

Mandy Nagy aka @Liberty_Chick is one of conservative blogger Andrew Breitbart's most trusted researchers. Her Twitter profile states: "Writer & Researcher @BigGovt @BigJournalism @BigHollywood Spicy, sassy Libertarian-conservapunk. Ex-techie. Musician. #Lupus. Politics + antics + potty mouth."

On a top secret assignment, she has spent the last five months chasing a woman named Darrah Ford on behalf of Mike Stack aka @Goatsred - the "Weinergate co-pilot" who edited a porn forum as late as March of 2011 and exchanged Direct Messages with Twitterers he thought were teenage girls following Rep. Weiner (see Smoking Gun article which Stack complains is harassment and was the result of "blackmail": link).



Like a badge of honor, Stack's avatar at the porn forums where he worked as a mod referred to himself as "pervert."

[Editor's Note: Stack's anonymous buddy from the porn forums, DonnysPoodle, argues that Stack didn't choose "pervert"; however, Stack did choose to continue working and posting at a forum under that title.]



At Mediaite, Tommy Christopher argued that "conservative activist Dan Wolfe‘s crusade against Weiner brought one 16 year-old girl into contact with Mike Stack, a man with a troubling history."

Christopher continued,

"According to The Smoking Gun, Stack has a few skeletons in his closet (who doesn’t?), but the most glaring fact that they’ve uncovered is the fact that Stack, whose clique harangued Rep. Weiner for following and DMing porn star Ginger Lee because he liked her blog (I do too, she’s funny and smart), was, himself, a moderator on a porn site. He once told a commenter on another porn site, “I just know not to look a gift horse in the mouth. Kind of like when your daddy shoves his **** in your mouy=th.'”

"This is the man who managed to come in contact with 16 year-old Veronica, and tried to contact her friend Betty. For one so concerned, Stack doesn’t appear to have tried to contact the authorities about his concerns, or seek permission from either girl’s parents to speak to them."

[Editor's Note: I helped disprove Christopher's scoop on the teen girls with Jen Preston of The New York Times in an article published days after Weiner resigned - but that should have ran sooner: link. Christopher worked closely with Breitbart on his Weinergate stories and - in one of many possible scenarios - may have stalled Preston in providing the faked identifications which helped confirm that the teens were fake.]

On May 28, Stack made the following public tweet: "@AndrewBreitbart @patriotusa76 and I have tons of stuff DM for phone numbers."



The 5/28 Patriotusa76 tweet in the above picture was sent at 5:53 AM EST, six hours after Dan Wolfe first retweeted the underwear tweet. Stack keeps his tweets protected, so I don't know if he deleted his tweet to Breitbart.

Doug Stewart aka Doug Life aka @Dmatthewstewart - a contributor for Breitbart associate Pat Dollard and at Yahoo News - was recruited by Nagy to help her back in June and he has ties to right wing hackers (many posts at his blog cheer the actions of th3j35t3r aka "The Jester": link).



Stack is friends with Sean Tompkins and Michael Whitacre, two porn enthusiasts who are connected to a site called www.therealpornwikileaks.com. Even though the two have left a long trail of menacing and harassing women on the Internet, they pretend to be good guys who are against stalkers and releasing private information on people connected to the adult film industry. But they use fake accounts on twitter and delete their tweets and get away with menacing women because no one seems to care about harassment of porn actresses and many seem to think it comes with the territory.

(Editor's note: Whitacre and Tompkins leave many comments at the LukeIsBack blog condemning mostly women who want to reform the porn industry, here's one sample, but I'll be showcasing many more in the future: link )

Here are screenshots of the Breitbart crew and the PornWikiLeaks crew working together. Note how Doug Stewart sends what he suspects is an #OWS twitterer's IP address to Andrew Breitbart and how Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney Patrick Frey aka @Patterico RTs a mocking tweet about how Darrah Ford should have "secured the back end of the blog" to prevent them from broadcasting her IP address all over twitter.

(Apologies to Ms. Ford - which is an alias - for including her IP address in these screenshots but it's the only way to show the harassment and how it's connected to Andrew Breitbart)

DonnysPoodle deleted the tweet he sent to @OccupySomething nearly a month ago which said, "Darrah why did you stick your nose into #Weinergate you fucking cunt cc: @TRPWL @mrwhiteacre @Liberty_Chick? @LukeIsBack."

Los Angeles Deputy District Attorney Patrick Frey aka @Patterico and Mandy Nagy often complain about nasty and rude sentiments expressed to Andrew Breitbart on Twitter but both remain silent about the use of the "c" word and worse by other members of their "posses."

On June 8, a twitterer named Jason Fontenont aka @Guerreraux tweeted, "@Liberty_Chick @darrahford @andrewbreitbart but she is a dirty whore, nothing she says is fact other than she makes her living on her knees," but no one in the Breitbart gang ever takes responsibility for such inflammatory gang bullying.











After @OccupySomething closed up her Twitter account a few days later due to the barrage of menacers, Breitbart's researcher Mandy Nagy tweeted that she might open another one using a name "along the lines of OccupyMyOrifice."



In July of 2010, Stack left the following comment at a blog called Angry White Dude on a post about Andrew Breitbart (link): "Andrew has been changing the media since day one. He is truly an inspiration and a real American. PS—This site AWD is f’in awesome."

The Angry White Dude blog argues it "is not a white supremacist page. We believe that all are created equal. We do not tolerate use of the N word in describing blacks. We do ridicule those who deserve ridicule. In short, we speak like a bunch of good friends speak when we discuss topics. Our arguments are backed by logic and rationale. We tolerate dissenting opinions…although we obliterate their positions with truth, reason and logic."

Three days after complimenting Breitbart, Stack aka Redgoat viciously attacked Darrah Ford at the LukeIsBack blog: link.

redgoat Says:

Darrah, you are a worthless cunt.

Don’t worry about who I am talking to and what I am doing, just like you say to me.

So, to make a blanket statement saying that I would be blamed if something happened to you is reckless. Frankly, I hope you get hit by a car in Malden driven by an ex-porn star. And, I wouldn’t go near that slum, so they’d have no reason to blame me.

As far as babbling about the “real world”, I think you have a very blurred line as to what the real world is. You go to the factory to work every day, come home and tweet to faceless “followers”. That’s not the real world.

The real world is Freedom Of Speech and this right I will continue to apply to my hatred of you.

So, get off your soapbox and get real.

Nobody gives a fuck about you like they don’t about me.

You seem to take this internet thing too seriously.

Dry up and drop off of the face of this earth.

July 21st, 2010 at 2:08 p

Dan Wolfe told conservative blogger Joe Brooks in a DM interview in June that he was upset that Stack seemed to have a tight relationship with Breitbart (link):

(10: 09:58 PM) dwp676740 Another glaring lie

(10: 10:08 PM) dwp676740 Is Mike's involvement with Breitbart

(10: 10:22 PM) dwp676740 Mike was in CONSTANT contact with Breitbart

(10: 10:29 PM) dwp676740 I believe I might have these DMS

(10: 10:58 PM) dwp676740 Mike kept trying to drag ME in and said "Buddy this is it we can take him down for good and YOU made it possible thank you!!!"

(10: 11:10 PM) dwp676740 God I am disappointed in him.

(10: 11:44 PM) dwp676740 That is why I said -- I don't want to contact Breitbart because people will say "Dan was WORKING WITH BREITBART to take down Weiner"

(10: 12:00 PM) dwp676740 I stuck to that even though they pushed and pushed and pushed.

(10: 12:05 PM) dwp676740 Mike is not being truthful.

(10: 12:11 PM) dwp676740 I believe I have all these DMS

(10: 12:15 PM) dwp676740 This is bullshit

....

(10: 24:10 PM) dwp676740 That's why I was so stubborn about not talking with Breitbart - I said I'll show you the caps and ok, my part is over

(10: 24:17 PM) dwp676740 I wanted to be able to say

(10: 24:24 PM) dwp676740 I never worked with Breitbart

(10: 24:26 PM) dwp676740 And that's true

(10: 24:32 PM) dwp676740 He confirmed already

(10: 24:38 PM) dwp676740 It ended with me sending caps

(10: 24:46 PM) dwp676740 Done. Finished.

(10: 24:52 PM) dwp676740 They never used. That's it

(10: 25:30 PM) joe.brooks You were trying to protect Breitbart then?

(10: 25:57 PM) joe.brooks How did Andrew contact you, was it through email or DM?

(10: 26:25 PM) dwp676740 No not trying to protect Breitbart more than I was trying to protect myself

(10: 26:38 PM) dwp676740 I didn't want it to be "Oh Dan is working with Breitbart"

(10: 26:48 PM) dwp676740 Nothing against Breitbart at all

(10: 26:58 PM) joe.brooks But that'd be a bad image on you?

(10: 26:58 PM) dwp676740 I just keep saying I don't want to team up with media

(10: 27:14 PM) dwp676740 Yes because teaming up with media is not what I wanted

(10: 27:22 PM) dwp676740 All I did was RT

(10: 27:24 PM) dwp676740 That's it

(10: 29:22 PM) joe.brooks How long was it before Breitbart contacted you?

(10: 29:39 PM) dwp676740 He actually didn't contact me. Did you read the interview?

(10: 29:56 PM) joe.brooks oh I'm sorry. I must have misread it.

(10: 30:19 PM) joe.brooks it was someone else from his site then?

(10: 31:24 PM) dwp676740 Yeah I went all over this. Dana DM me and asked to see what I had for screen shots. I gave her my email and Breitbart emailed me and I sent him the shots. They didn't use. End of story.

(10: 31:58 PM) dwp676740 Breitbart wanted me to cal because he and Mike and Breitbarts team were planning some big reveal that they found more stuff on Weiner.

(10: 32:13 PM) dwp676740 That was from Mike - mike told me that

(10: 32:21 PM) dwp676740 And Breitbart kept asking for a call

(10: 32:39 PM) dwp676740 I was stubborn and said no -- no way can't call. I don't wt to be involved any further.

(10: 32:41 PM) dwp676740 That's it.

(10: 33:00 PM) dwp676740 I don't want people to say "oh Dan Wolfe was Breitbart's partner"

(10: 33:29 PM) joe.brooks Did you know what Mike was talking to Breitbart about?

(10: 33:34 PM) dwp676740 Breitbart should be grateful to me because of that. At the time he was a bit annoyed but now I think he sees it was the bestthing to do.

(10: 33:37 PM) dwp676740 Yeah

(10: 34:24 PM) dwp676740 Mike said they had lined up some top Democratic Donor of Weiner's that paid young girls to entertain DEMS. They said it was gonna come out this past Tuesday. It never did

(10: 34:28 PM) dwp676740 I wanted no part in that

(10: 34:48 PM) dwp676740 Mike was the one saying "Come on buddy -- let's finish him off!"

(10: 34:59 PM) dwp676740 "Don't leave now! We'er so close"

(10: 35:15 PM) dwp676740 I was like no -- I RT -- that's where I end this. Just the RT.

(10: 35:17 PM) dwp676740 That's all

(10: 35:43 PM) dwp676740 See why I'm so pissed at that audio with Lee and Mike?

(10: 35:52 PM) joe.brooks Dang. Did Mike share with you the proof on that story?

(10: 36:08 PM) dwp676740 No he did not. That's as far as he would go.

(10: 36:16 PM) dwp676740 And frankly I didn't want to know more

(10: 36:44 PM) dwp676740 I wanted to be able to say "I'm clean here - no involvement in a partnership with Breitbart or ANY media to take Weiner down"

(10: 36:49 PM) dwp676740 And I can say that.

(10: 36:51 PM) joe.brooks That would have been a big story, huh?

(10: 36:55 PM) dwp676740 Yeah

(10: 36:59 PM) dwp676740 But see what I mean

(10: 37:03 PM) dwp676740 Now I can say that

(10: 37:08 PM) dwp676740 Who can contradict me?

(10: 37:14 PM) dwp676740 I never allowed calls

(10: 37:18 PM) dwp676740 Or communication

(10: 37:27 PM) dwp676740 I believe I was smart to do that

(10: 37:38 PM) dwp676740 I believe it's one of the smartest things I've done

In October, Mike Stack had all his posts under the moniker "Redgoat" scrubbed from the XXX Porn Talk forum he moderated at, all that remains is traces from Google: link.

But Stack colludes with his friends from the Porn WikiLeaks and Breitbart crews to portray Darrah Ford as the "real stalker" from behind his now locked and private Twitter account.

Search "ronbryn" in Twitter (link) to see both gangs in action as they cherry-pick tweets to "Alinsky the situation" and accuse me of being a "stalker" and "criminal" for attempting to get to the bottom of why fake Twitter accounts were used to go after Rep. Weiner and its links to the Porn WikiLeaks controversy and the menacing of porn industry reformers who want condoms used in adult films to help prevent the spread of AIDS.

[Editor's Note: Doug argues in the comments that he only retweeted the IP address which DonnysPoodle first tweeted, as if his retweet didn't still send the address to Breitbart's mailbox. Deleting names from retweets isn't hard, but the Breitbart and WikiLeaks porn gangs use it as a deliberate cyber-bullying tactic. Over the weekend, Doug and his drunk buddies sent a barrage of offensive tweets back-and-forth that included my name and Nagy's - who was at a convention. One choice tweet from Doug: "@DefendWallSt Yep-Free cocks all over the fucking place courtesy of --> @ronbryn cc: @goatsred @trpwl @zapem @donnyspoodle @liberty_chick."

Doug changed the name on his Twitter account to "Banana Phone" in reference to a blog post he wrote which called me a criminal and - I presume, satirically - claimed I like to pleasure myself with a phone shaped like a banana. I find his humor menacing, especially since he claims his motivation against Anonymous and #OWS - who he falsely links me to even though I have criticized and probed both - is revenge over an alleged assault with an ice pick that sent him to the hospital.]